The Psychology Behind Unwavering Supporters of Donald Trump and other recent Populists

Psychologists have researced how Donald Trump and other recent populists have gained and maintained support despite shocking behavior.

The following is a copy of this Psycology Today article by Bobby Azarian Ph.D.(Mind In The Machine) from 2016 with edits in italics for updates to reflect current information. It focuses on Donald Trump supporters but similar is involved with supports of other revent populists.

It followed by information on some other well known and related factors involved that were not covered in this article.

There’s no doubt that Donald Trump has said many things that would have been political suicide for any other Republican candidate or a President. Almost every time he made one of these shocking statements, political analysts on both the left and the right predicted that he’d lose supporters because of it. As we have clearly seen over the past four years, they were dead wrong nearly every time. Trump appears to be almost bulletproof including for many, the handling of the covid-19 pandemic that has killed or accelerated the death of over 235,000 people in the United States.

The only thing that might be more perplexing than the psychology of Donald Trump is the psychology of his strong supporters. In their eyes, The Donald can do no wrong. Even Trump himself seems to be astonished by this phenomenon. “I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn’t lose any voters, OK? It’s, like, incredible.

So are Trump loyalists psychologically or neurologically different from everyone else? What is going on in their psyche that makes them so willing to ignore this behavior?

Research has indicated some of the things involved.

1. The Dunning-Kruger Effect

Some believe that many of those who support Donald Trump do so because of ignorance — that basically they are under-informed, misinformed or mislead about the real issues at hand. When Trump tells them that crime is skyrocketing in the United States, or that the economy is the best or worst it’s ever been, they take his word for it.

The seemingly obvious solution would be to try to reach those people through political ads, expert opinions, and logical arguments that educate with facts. Except none of those things seem to be swaying any Trump supporters from his side, despite great efforts to deliver this information to them directly.

The Dunning-Kruger effect explains that the problem isn’t just that they are misinformed; it’s that they are completely unaware that they are misinformed. This creates a double burden.

Studies have shown that people who lack expertise in some area of knowledge often have a cognitive bias that prevents them from realizing that they lack expertise. As psychologist David Dunning wrote in an op-ed for Politico, “The knowledge and intelligence that are required to be good at a task are often the same qualities needed to recognize that one is not good at that task — and if one lacks such knowledge and intelligence, one remains ignorant that one is not good at the task. This includes political judgment.” …

And if one is under the illusion that they have sufficient or even superior knowledge, then they have no reason to defer to anyone else’s judgment. This helps explain why even nonpartisan experts — like military generals and Independent former Mayor of New York/billionaire CEO Michael Bloomberg — as well as some respected Republican politicians, don’t seem to be able to say anything that can change the minds of loyal Trump followers.

2. Hypersensitivity to Threat

Science has unequivocally shown that the conservative brain has an exaggerated fear response when faced with stimuli that may be perceived as threatening. A 2008 study in the journal Science found that conservatives have a stronger physiological reaction to startling noises and graphic images compared to liberals. A brain-imaging study published in Current Biology revealed that those who lean right politically tend to have a larger amygdala — a structure that is electrically active during states of fear and anxiety. And a 2014 fMRI study found that it is possible to predict whether someone is a liberal or conservative simply by looking at their brain activity while they view threatening or disgusting images, such as mutilated bodies. Specifically, the brains of self-identified conservatives generated more activity overall in response to the disturbing images.

So how does this help explain the unbridled loyalty of Trump supporters? These brain responses are automatic, and not influenced by logic or reason. As long as Trump continues his fear mongering by constantly portraying Muslims and Mexican immigrants as imminent dangers, many conservative brains will involuntarily light up like light bulbs being controlled by a switch. Fear keeps his followers energized and focused on safety. And when you think you’ve found your protector, you become less concerned with remarks that would normally be seen as highly offensive.

3. Terror Management Theory

A well-supported theory from social psychology, called Terror Management Theory, explains why Trump’s fear mongering is doubly effective.

The theory is based on the fact that humans have a unique awareness of their own mortality. The inevitably of one’s death creates existential terror and anxiety that is always residing below the surface. In order to manage this terror, humans adopt cultural worldviews — like religions, political ideologies, and national identities — that act as a buffer by instilling life with meaning and value. …

Terror Management Theory predicts that when people are reminded of their own mortality, which happens with fear mongering, they will more strongly defend those who share their worldviews and national or ethnic identity, and act out more aggressively towards those who do not. Hundreds of studies have confirmed this hypothesis, and some have specifically shown that triggering thoughts of death tends to shift people towards the right.

Not only do death reminders increase nationalism, they influence actual voting habits in favor of more conservative presidential candidates. And more disturbingly, in a study with American students, scientists found that making mortality salient increased support for extreme military interventions by American forces that could kill thousands of civilians overseas. Interestingly, the effect was present only in conservatives, which can likely be attributed to their heightened fear response.

By constantly emphasizing existential threat, Trump creates a psychological condition that makes the brain respond positively rather than negatively to bigoted statements and divisive rhetoric. Liberals and Independents who have been puzzled over why Trump hasn’t lost supporters after such highly offensive comments need look no further than Terror Management Theory.

In this video, I explain this in greater detail, and offer a potential solution to the problem.

In this video, I explain this in greater detail, and offer a potential solution to the problem.

More on this here:

Trump banks on fear and anxiety to motivate voters – cbsnews

4. High Attentional Engagement

According to a recent study that monitored brain activity while participants watched 40 minutes of political ads and debate clips from the presidential candidates, Donald Trump is unique in his ability to keep the brain engaged. While Hillary Clinton could only hold attention for so long, Trump kept both attention and emotional arousal high throughout the viewing session. This pattern of activity was seen even when Trump made remarks that individuals didn’t necessarily agree with. His showmanship and simple messages clearly resonate at a visceral level.

Essentially, the loyalty of Trump supporters may in part be explained by America’s addiction with entertainment and reality TV. To some, it doesn’t matter what Trump actually says because he’s so amusing to watch. With Donald, you are always left wondering what outrageous thing he is going to say or do next. He keeps us on the edge of our seat, and for that reason, some Trump supporters will forgive anything he says. They are happy as long as they are kept entertained.

Of course these explanations do not apply to all Trump supporters. In fact, some may support Trump to be rebellious or to introduce chaos into the system. They may have such distaste for the establishment and Hillary Clinton that their vote for Trump is a symbolic middle finger directed at Washington.

So what can we do to potentially change the minds of Trump loyalists before voting day in November? As a cognitive neuroscientist, it grieves me to say that there may be nothing we can do. The overwhelming majority of these people may be beyond reach, at least in the short term. The best we can do is to motivate everyone else to get out to the voting booths.

This article was originally published at Raw Story.

Related

Have Trump supporters been influenced?

The facts that came out of the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal demonstrated how millions of voters in the US were mislead and influenced leading up to and during the 2016 US presidential election. The same unethical if not unlawful methods also used to influence the Brexit referendum and hundreds of elections globally. More this on Wikipedia.

There is also charges, convictions and very concerning details that were verified in the Robert Muller and related investigations, reports, court cases and congressional hearings.

These related to people involved in the 2016 Trump campaign, hacking by Russian agencies of DNC computers and public officials, leaking of private data and millions of fake accounts created on Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms by Russian agencies and other foreign entities. These used to influence the 2016 US presidential election, other elections, Brexit, incite violence, negatively affect public discourse, create divisiveness and instability in well established countries and democracies.

‘Populism’: Bailouts, Brexit and battling rapid climate change | CBC Radio

About Kevin Yaworski

I use my blog to write about things that I think are a matter of public interest or that I think others will be interested in
This entry was posted in Computers and Internet, democracy, international, News and politics, social media and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.