Not Impaired by Cannabis Court Decision

Interesting decision from 2011 in Saskatchewan. I think there will be many on both sides that agree or disagree with it.

This after accused being pulled over by a police Checkstop. These are funded by MPI in MB and usually give out hundreds of fines instead of warnings that turn into fine if not corrected for low tread, tail light burnt out, head lights pointed too high, light bars, tinted windows and other customizations etc…

At least no demerits for non moving violations. They should be warnings unless repeat or not corrected and proof provided to MPI with in x period. The drunks reported outside bars often ignored by police, diverting of funds and pensionable OT for at least WPS plus less focus on serious crime are the bigger issues.

Some have said “clearly this person related to someone”

“Hmmm, a judge with common sense, he would not last a week on the bench in Winnipeg.”

Good possibility but not all Judicuaries are as biased as Manitobas. Even in Manitoba we have had several public interest decisions among a trend of opposite.

CBC News · Posted: Aug 31, 2012 7:35 AM CT | Last Updated: August 31, 2012

About Kevin Yaworski

I use my blog to write about things that I think are a matter of public interest or that I think others will be interested in
This entry was posted in News and politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s